In Impact Pricing: Your Blueprint for Driving Profits
from
Entrepreneur Press, pricing expert Mark Stiving offers practical advice
to business owners on how to price products and services. In this
edited excerpt, he explains several important pricing concepts.
Price may not be the basis of your corporate strategy, but you must have a pricing strategy
to implement your corporate strategy. Remember that pricing strategies
are big-picture decisions that provide guidance to the people within
your organization who actually set prices. They are your pricing
processes and policies.
When you ask a marketer
"What are some pricing strategies?" you will likely get the answer that
there are three pricing strategies: neutral, penetration and skimming.
Do a Google search on "pricing strategy," and you'll find the same
answer over and over: neutral, penetration, and skimming. These
certainly are pricing strategies, but they are not the only ones. A
better way to look at this is that these are pricing strategies to
define the general level of prices.
Neutral Pricing
Neutral pricing, the most common pricing strategy, means that you price
so that your customers are relatively indifferent between your product
and your competitor's product after all features and benefits, including
price, are taken into account. Of course not all customers will be
indifferent. Some will like your offering better, others will like your
competitor's better. From this perspective, think of neutral pricing as
maintaining the status quo. You aren't trying to gain or lose market
share. Most pricing in relatively stable markets would be considered
neutral. As you walk through a grocery store, the prices you see are
neutral. Although you may use a combination of neutral, penetration, and
skimming prices, you will most often use neutral.
Penetration Pricing
Penetration pricing means pricing more aggressively than neutral. It can
be used to gain market share relative to your competition -- but be
careful. This can and does start price wars. No company wants to lose
market share, and if you lower your price in an effort to gain market
share, your competitors are likely to lower their prices just to keep
their share.
A more appropriate and common use of penetration pricing is to speed up
the growth of a newly forming market. Low pricing is often justified to
quickly grow a new market and to gain the largest share as the market
grows. This strategy works best when you are the first entrant, or one
of the first entrants, into a market. Penetration pricing in this
situation may also deter other companies from competing when they
recognize there are not huge profits to be gained.
Forward Pricing
Forward pricing is another term similar to penetration pricing, but with
a focus on future costs. If you're building a product and it costs $1
to make, you probably don't want to sell it for less than $1. However,
if you know that once you sell a million units, your costs will go down
to $0.30, you may be willing to sell at a price lower than your current
costs knowing that your costs will be lower in the future. The forward
part of the name indicates you're looking forward in time to estimate
what your costs will be and using that cost as your basis for pricing.
Skimming
Skimming is the opposite of penetration pricing. Companies skim in an
effort to segment the market, to get the customers who are willing to
pay more to do so. The two common implementations of skimming are at new
product launch and at the end of a product's life.
When companies skim during new product launch, they are selling to
customers with a high willingness to pay. Once this market is depleted
(or at least slows down), the company lowers the price to sell to the
next tier of customers.
A recent, famous example of this was the initial release of the Apple
iPhone. Apple released the iPhone on Sept. 5, 2007, for $599. Apple
fans rushed out to purchase the iPhone. Two months later Apple lowered
the price to $399 to capture even more customers. The earliest adopters
paid $200 more for the privilege of being first. In this case, though,
Apple got a black eye. The huge price decrease was too much too soon
according to the early adopters. Remember, these early adopters were big
fans and Apple risked losing significant customer goodwill from these,
their best customers. Apple eventually gave each of the early adopters a
$100 store credit.
Skimming as a market entry strategy only works when you have a
monopolistic position (the iPhone was unique). The lesson from Apple's
case is to bring your price down slowly. The news articles at the time
didn't berate Apple for lowering the price, they berated it for lowering
the price too soon.
The other common use of skimming is at a product's end of life.
Sometimes firms would like to discontinue a product but have too many
customers who have a continuing need for it. In this situation, the
company may gradually increase prices over market value to gain more
revenue from these customers. The firm is trading off being able to
compete for new business for additional revenue on existing business.
One big caution is that customers, especially loyal customers like
these, don't like to have their prices raised. You must have a good
explanation and possibly an alternative offering.
It should be apparent that these three strategies follow specific
corporate objectives. If a corporate objective is to raise ASP (average
selling price), then skimming may be appropriate. If a corporate
objective is to win market share, then penetration pricing is needed. If
the corporate strategy is to generate and capture value, then neutral
pricing would be appropriate.
Value-Based Pricing
Value-based pricing, another pricing strategy, is the most important.
The idea seems simple. How much is your customer willing to pay? Set the
price at or just below that point.
However, the implementation and usage of value-based pricing is much more complex.
Throughout business history, firms traditionally used the cost-plus
method of determining prices. They determined how much their product
cost to make and then added whatever margin they thought they deserved.
Hence, the term cost-plus. Cost-plus pricing has some advantages: It's
simple, you don't have to understand your customers, and it's easy for
you and your competitors to get in sync. However, cost-plus is not
optimal pricing.
You have to make a strategic pricing decision. Are you going to use
cost-plus pricing or value-based pricing (or some other method)? If you
want to increase profits, you will commit to using value-based pricing.
As you learn more about value-based pricing, you'll learn that it's
impossible to implement perfectly. After all, our customers never tell
us exactly how much they're willing to pay. However, value-based pricing
is accepted by pricing professionals and consultants as the optimal
pricing strategy.